tunnelcat wrote:DXX is really good on a high end machine, isn't it? I'm spoiled, especially with a 19 inch display and a resolution of 1600 X 1200 and full 8X FSAA! Puts the Voodoo card to shame. I've got it framed on the wall right now.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b22ad/b22ad6c26ab68194a2f3fb04481c3a9f96919b50" alt="Laughing :lol:"
ugh no though Rotated Grid FSAA x8 on a 6000 is hard to beat qua image qullity
hesince 6000 costs about 1700+ in euro's if you can afford one, I'd say see for yourself, since one just got sold on ebay heh
http://cgi.ebay.nl/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vie ... :IT&ih=008
The thing is, is that NewGen cards need software to adavnce their FSAA , the Voodoo4/5 series do this 100% hardware matic, the only disadavntage that this brings is a heavy performance loss, though for retro games like Descent3 this isn't the issue.
FSAA x8 on a 6000 is comparable to FSAA x 12 on a new gen VGA card from NV or ATi, I have the cards here my self and yes 3dfx has the best FSAA in the house, just basing the facts here, go and ask the other 12000+ 3dfx people and you'll truly get the same kind of answer, as this discussion has been discussed on many different 3dfx fora for many of times.
The advatage of FSAA done partually software matic is that the lesser impact is of the total performance loss thereby using greater FSAA modes with similar image quallity or better depends on which setting ofcourse.
I have been testing 3dfx prototypes among my other 3dfxcollectors as ex-3dfx engineers as friends and yes 3dfx still holds the number one FSAA image quality if compared to the same FSAA setting, so what you said isn't true to a certain degree.