TIGERassault wrote:
Look at it like this: which would you prefer, that Descent 1 and 2 are still on sale, or that they just weren't made at all anymore?
Anyway, saying that you're dissapointed that a company isn't giving stuff away for free is a bit... much.
A bit much?
The game is over
ten years old. Unless Interplay has some grand plan to port it to every gaming system under the sun, it should be free. Not only that, but if it wasn't for Zico and even Diedel, the thing wouldn't even run on modern PCs.
So yes, it is goofy that Interplay would still charge for the game instead of releasing it into the wild and allowing people to freely experience it. People aren't going to go out and buy it anymore. You're only hurting the larger install base you could potentially have by sitting on it.
EA released the first two Command and Conquer games for free. Why? Because they've made their profit and don't do anything useful sitting in a back closet. In fact, the real purpose was likely to people excited about Red Alert 3. You don't do any harm by getting yourself into the gaming blogs for a day or two and letting people reminiscence about how great your game was. That's how you generate buzz for your future prospects in this day and age.