it sure looks real
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e8f3c/e8f3c92f5287e3f6848a3845d038f63be21dd02b" alt="Very Happy :D"
It pays to read the replies on that pageThe UK newspaper The Telegraph has just exposed this story as a hoax. Alistair Mitchell, a frustrated writer, devised the plan to create the dragon in order to create publicity for his planned thriller for adults and children, which features a dragon. He is reported to have said: "Essentially I created the hoax to market my book even before it was published." The dragon was created by the professional model-makers behind the BBC's Walking With Dinosaurs television programs (shame on them if they knew they were involved in a hoax!). The glass jar was made by a well-known glass-blowing studio in the Isle of Wight that I visited once.
For more details, go to: http://www.rense.com/general50/hoax.htm
and to:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jh ... xhome.html
Of course it's not an umbilical cord. But, is it something that would leave a mark? How are yolks physically attached to the bird/reptilian/etc.?Tyranny wrote: Sol, I'm not certain on that one. I'm no expert on the matter, but from what I've seen most reptiles aren't born with protruding umbilical chords once hatched
good eyes mobi.Mobius wrote:Is it really worth mentioning that that animal's chest would have to be about a foot deeper with a keel-like Sternum in order for the wings to actually get it airborn?