data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/333a8/333a8ecbe33ea89eeadd7a334b24f05351d6e51d" alt="Smile :)"
*OMG page 5!
Moderators: Tunnelcat, Jeff250
It's because of a Supreme Court case called New York Times v. Sullivan. A cause of action for defamation is held to a much higher standard (and therefore, is much more difficult to sustain) when the communication at issue involves a public figure, or a matter of public interest.Ferno wrote:Here's another question. if Moore did indeed lie.. how come he hasn't been sued for slander or libel?
So we now can toss the 'moore lies' theroy out the window.woodchip wrote:Ferno, as I read it Moore dodn't out and out lie. He created a perception of something suspicious by artful arranging of facts and sly innuendo. It was then left to the viewer to come to a conclusion. No direct lying or slander involved.