Page 2 of 2
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2004 11:50 am
by roid
{OSS}Paedric wrote:
roid wrote:he wasn't driving the car, he was a passenger.
Since you seem to be referencing my post Roid, perhaps you should actually read it first.
nah i wasn't referencing your post, i just noticed it as i was rereading the original article. i missed it the first read, figured other people had as well.
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2004 1:34 pm
by {OSS}Paedric
roid wrote:nah i wasn't referencing your post, i just noticed it as i was rereading the original article. i missed it the first read, figured other people had as well.
Okay, no worries and no offense intended.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/333a8/333a8ecbe33ea89eeadd7a334b24f05351d6e51d" alt="Smile :)"
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2004 1:37 pm
by AceCombat
Ferno wrote:and before you ask why, remember.. we have AceCombat in our ranks.
SHADDDUP!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b22ad/b22ad6c26ab68194a2f3fb04481c3a9f96919b50" alt="Laughing :lol:"
Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2004 5:18 pm
by [DWL]Punk
even though the artical says that the cops got permission to search the car, why would you do that though? every time i have gotten stopped and they ask to search my vehical, i sure as hell say no, and it has saved me many times.
the driver must have not had enough balls to stand up to sociopathic cops.