Just Friday I got new memory and a second Display card (Geforce 210) to add in on my aging server setup to boost the performance a tad, install win 7 and setup a triple monitor setup on it. All was going good until I tried to extent the desktop to the third screen but every time I did it it kept telling my it was unable to save the settings
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80d95/80d95714352f05aae6cc56e7e9a38bf5c9c1b180" alt="Confused :?"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e2f7/6e2f736b30c40c39cfb2240ae8427a07e98d1f5d" alt="Evil or Very Mad :evil:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80d95/80d95714352f05aae6cc56e7e9a38bf5c9c1b180" alt="Confused :?"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30ad5/30ad579d573225261c6e815c5263aaa274fb3f0b" alt="Mad :x"
Well besides wasting money now on usable memory in effect I'm forced to get a new motherboard and the works. (on a side note I'll try to see whether my supplier would look at giving me a credit to the value if the DDR1 on my upgrade purchase if I return it to them as it is virtually unused). That said and done my problem I facing is deciding what route to go now for the motherboard.
1) I don't know whether it was the motherboard or not causing the 3rd screen not to save in win 7 and work or whether it was a compatibility issue between the 6600GT and Geforce 210 or drivers?
(I might just mention that I installed the 266.77 drivers for the 210 but then the 6600 moaned and I rolled the 6600 back to what win 7 installed for it and both showed in the device manager as working properly)
2) I'm looking at either the MSI 880GMA-E45 or 790FX-GD70 as a replacement board. This choice will boil down to whether one is able to enable the on board display with a PCI-e card to achieve a triple monitor setup or not if not I'll be force to go with the more expensive one that has 4 PCI-e slots that is a bit overkill for my current needs. (an other consideration why I'm looking at these two are they both support RAID 5 as my setup will later need to run a RAID 5 setup, that and costs as I'm trying to absorb the knock of this unforeseen little failure now
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15060/1506049146e6d3db3931e482bb7508db3a06c513" alt="Crying or Very sad :cry:"
Any inputs on the above choice or alternative suggestions please do as I need to contact my supplier by Monday as they only allow a limited time for refunding/crediting goods and then I need to place my new order as well.
Thanks in advance